DOJ releases overruled memos anticipating it bootleg for presidents to designate relatives

October 3, 2017 - Finding Carter


White House Senior Adviser Jared Kushner and President Donald Trump are pictured. | AP

In January, a career Justice Department central radically announced a progressing opinions erring or obsolete, clearing a approach for President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner to take a comparison confidant position in a White House. | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

The authorised opinion that privileged a approach for Kushner and Ivanka Trump appointments topsy-turvy progressing advice.

The Justice Department has expelled a array of recently overruled authorised memos final that presidents can't designate their kin to a White House staff or presidential commissions, even to delinquent posts.

In January, a career Justice Department central radically declared a progressing opinions erring or obsolete, clearing a approach for President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner to take a comparison confidant position in a White House. First daughter Ivanka Trump after took a identical central though delinquent slot underneath a same authorised rationale.

Story Continued Below

The newly-disclosed opinions, expelled to a Nixon, Carter and Reagan White House and performed by POLITICO Monday by a Freedom of Information Act request, fact how Justice Department lawyers resolved for decades that such appointments of family members were bootleg underneath an anti-nepotism law upheld in 1967.

“You have asked for a opinion on a doubt either a President could designate Mrs. Carter to be Chairman of a Commission on Mental Health due to be determined in a stirring Executive Order. It is a opinion that he competence not,” behaving Assistant Attorney General John Harmon wrote in a Feb 1977 memo to Carter White House Associate Counsel Douglas Huron.

An trustworthy memo from Edwin Kneedler, now a many comparison career profession in a Office of a Solicitor General, resolved that an titular post for Mrs. Carter would not run afoul of a law upheld in 1967 and prolonged viewed as a response to President John F. Kennedy’s appointment of his hermit Robert Kennedy as Attorney General.

“Although a matter is not unconditionally giveaway from doubt, we do not trust that [the 1967 legislation] would demarcate Mrs. Carter from holding an radically titular position, such as Honorary Chairman, associated to a Commission’s work,” wrote Kneedler.

The following month, Rosalynn Carter, was named to only such an titular post.

“Although Mrs. Carter is portion as titular chairperson of a Commission, she will be actively concerned in all aspects of a Commission’s work,” a White House matter said.

At about a same time, Kneedler expelled another opinion final that one of a Carters’ sons could not proffer to work for a White House staff member. Justice Department lawyers also radically vetoed a devise to have a Carter son, apparently James Earl “Chip” Carter III, to work out of a West Wing bureau while doing work for a Democratic National Committee, a newly-disclosed annals show.

In 1983, Justice Department lawyers seem to have dissuaded a Reagan White House from fixing an misleading Reagan family member to an advisory row on private-sector proffer efforts. “We consider a offer to have a member of a President’s family offer actively on a Commission on Private Sector Initiatives raises probably a same problems lifted by Mrs. Carter’s due service,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General Robert Shanks wrote.

The papers expelled Monday also embody a full content of a authorised opinion Justice expelled in 2009 to a Obama White House, final that a law did not assent a appointment of a president’s half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng to a elect on White House fellowships or a appointment of a president’s brother-in-law Conrad Robinson to a elect on earthy fitness. Soetoro-Ng appears to have sensitively left a fellowships panel, that she had assimilated before a authorised memo was finalized. Robinson was never named to a aptness board.

Just that relations or kin President Richard Nixon wanted to designate to a White House staff is unclear, though a Justice Department memo sent to a White House on a subject shortly after a president’s re-election in 1972 pronounced a 1967 law opposite employing kin was “clearly applicable” to reduce turn White House positions. It pronounced requesting a law to some-more comparison posts competence lift Constitutional questions.

The opinion longtime Justice Department profession Daniel Koffsky expelled in Jan during a ask of a incoming Trump administration resolved that another law upheld in 1978 and consultation extended management on a boss to designate White House officials radically overrides a progressing anti-nepotism measure.

“We trust that a President’s special employing management [in a 1978 law] permits him to make appointments to a White House Office that a anti-nepotism government competence differently forbid,” Koffsky wrote in a opinion sent to White House Counsel Donald McGahn during his request.

Several ethics experts were vicious of a Jan opinion.

“We consider a law is obscure and that a safer march would’ve been to ask Congress to solve a ambiguity,” former White House ethics lawyers Norman Eisen and Richard Painter pronounced in a corner matter during a time.

The existence of many of a authorised memos expelled to before White Houses became famous after a papers were cited in Koffsky’s opinion, that was done open by a Trump administration shortly after it was rigourously expelled on Inauguration Day. However, a content of a progressing opinions was not suggested during that time.

A counsel for Kushner, Jamie Gorelick, had no evident criticism about a memos when contacted Monday night, though in Jan she welcomed a Justice Department’s reversal.

“We believed that we had a improved evidence on this,” Gorelick said. “The Office of Legal Counsel of a Justice Department – in an opinion by a rarely regarded career Deputy Assistant Attorney General – adopted a position unchanging with a own.”

POLITICO requested a memos delivered to Obama and progressing presidents from a Justice Department final November, about week after Trump’s election.

In a minute concomitant Monday’s release, OLC profession Paul Colborn pronounced many of a memos were lonesome by attorney-client payoff or executive payoff germane to recommendation rendered to a boss or his aides. Colborn pronounced a Justice Department was releasing a opinions “as a matter of discretion.”

However, once Koffsky’s opinion citing a progressing memos and their motive was done public, a authorised justification to keep them tip competence have been undercut.

More carter ...

› tags: Finding Carter /