Lady Gaga’s former manager disagrees with Taylor Swift’s electioneer opposite Spotify

September 24, 2015 - Finding Carter

Pop song luminary Taylor Swift has railed opposite song streaming services like Spotify, going as distant as pulling all her song from them. Her reasons? They feat musicians by profitable them subsequent to zero for personification their song online radio.

But Troy Carter, improved famous in his home of Los Angeles as Lady Gaga’s former manager, isn’t shopping Swift’s argument.

“I consider Taylor is shining though we consider that’s arrange of a injured argument,” Carter pronounced during an talk during an annual discussion in San Francisco hosted by tech news site TechCrunch. “The choice is piracy.”

Last year, Swift, who has sole some-more than 40 million albums and 130 million singular downloads, announced that she wouldn’t make her latest album, 1989, accessible on Spotify or other services that let people listen for free. She took it a step serve by also stealing all her formerly expelled song from those services.

Then in March, rapper and business noble Jay-Z acquired and relaunched Tidal, a song streaming use that comes with no giveaway tier or hearing period, though offers a guarantee of occasional disdainful calm from artists. It also didn’t harm that Jay-Z got a squad of his song luminary friends to publicly support his service.

But Tidal hasn’t had a blockbuster success Jay-Z expected hoped for. And Carter blames a underwhelming response to a miss of a giveaway version, something Tidal’s competitors offer and use to tempt song fans. Why compensate for Tidal when we can put adult with Spotify’s ads, or get a giveaway hearing with Apple Music before carrying to bombard out money? (Tidal does have a giveaway month trial, like Apple Music, that Carter appears to have forgotten. But it doesn’t, however, have millions of credit cards already on file, as Apple does, that make signing adult that many easier.)

“Freemium” services, as they’re called, let business use a simple chronicle of as use though paying, though charges them for additional features, or, in a box of song streaming, to skip a ads on a giveaway version. Carter argues that they have been shown to work, and it’s a good concede that doesn’t divide song listeners and expostulate them to illegally download music.

Apple Music, a song streaming use a tech hulk denounced in June, is maybe a usually thing Carter and Swift can determine on. A integrate of a days before Apple was set to launch a service, Swift penned a ardent open letter to a company, arguing it should compensate artists for songs their business tide even during their giveaway one month trial. By a finish of a day, Apple agreed, and during launch time, Swift’s catalog was straightforwardly accessible for business to stream.

The genuine problem, in Carter’s view, is a record label’s attribute with these services and their control of many of a revenues. “We’ve always gotten screwed by a record labels,” he said.

“The record labels done a poignant volume of income from Spotify. It’s only not anticipating a approach into a hands of a artists,” he added.

Sign adult for Data Sheet, Fortune’s daily morning newsletter about a business of technology.

For an evidence opposite Spotify’s business model, watch this Fortune video:

(An progressing chronicle wrongly identified Carter as Lady Gaga’s manager, a position he no longer holds. The story has been updated to simulate this.)

More carter...

› tags: FindingCarter /